Industry News And Updates:
=======================
Story 1)  Suspension of Merchant Marine Act for 60 days - March 18, 2026

Story 2)  Amendment to the IMSBC Grain Code - January 1st 2026 - December 8, 2025

Story 3)  USTR Update - Supension of Vessel Fees for One Year - November 10, 2025

Story 4)  USTR Update on Chinese Built/Owned/Operates Vessels - October 14, 2025 Commencement - September 28th 2025

Story 5)  California's Emergency Ballast Water Management rule in Effect - July 17th 2025





Suspension of Merchant Marine Act for 60 Days - March 18th 2026
  • by  Evan Jones


Fm: General Steamship Corporation, Ltd.

Jones Act Waiver (March 2026)

On March 18, 2026, President Donald Trump authorized a temporary 60-day waiver of the Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act of 1920),a longstanding U.S. maritime law that typically requires goods transported between U.S. ports to be carried on American-built, owned, and crewed vessels.

The waiver allows foreign-flagged ships to transport key commodities between domestic ports. This move is intended to increase shipping flexibility, improve supply distribution, and reduce transportation costs during a period of market disruption. The policy was implemented in response to rising energy prices and supply chain disruptions linked to the ongoing conflict involving Iran, including impacts to global oil flows through critical shipping routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

The waiver is part of a broader set of emergency economic measures—such as releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve—aimed at stabilizing domestic markets and ensuring the continued flow of essential resources.

While the move is expected to improve logistical efficiency and ease regional supply constraints, most analysts believe it will have only a limited effect on overall fuel and other commodity prices, as global market conditions remain the primary driver of costs.

We are in contact with ASBA and US Customs and Border Protection for developments on this matter, and will provide updates as received. Please note several news articles on this topic for your reference: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/18/trump-jones-act-oil-iran-war.html
https://www.npr.org/2026/03/18/nx-s1-5751854/gas-prices-trump-jones-act-iran.html

Regards,
Evan Jones
Chief Operating Officer


Amendment to the IMSBC Grain Code - January 1st 2026
  • by  Russ Lyzell
Good day all,

As most of you are aware, on 23 May 2024, International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted Resolution MSC.552(108), which amends the Grain Code.
The amendments enter into force 1 January 2026.
We wish to provide the following update after discussion with local NCB surveyors. Their practice will be as follows after Jan 1, 2026:

AA) If vessel arrives with the addendum to the grain loading manual then there is no problem with loading.

BB) If vessel arrives without the addendum or a new grain loading manual containing the newly required data, then the options are as follows:

Adjust pre-stowage so that any holds showing cargo in the coaming – but not full – be revised so that the hold is;
a) made full (F/UT) or
b) cargo qty is reduced so that cargo level is below the bottom of the coaming.

CC) If unable to revise pre-stow and cargo will be in the coaming but hold will not be full, NCB will add a notation to their Certificate of Readiness (Pass) stating that “Forward and Aft ends of hold(s) number(s) *** must be trimmed”.

DD) If pre-stow shows a hold as full (F/UT) but unexpectedly does NOT fill, vessel will be permitted to sail, however vessel will be notified that if they return to a US port to load grain and still do not have the required addendum, they will be required to mechanically trim any holds where cargo level will be above the bottom of the coaming. We understand that NCB will keep a list of all vessels that use a one-time exemption and will rigorously monitor any return port calls.

If the vessel is required to mechanically trim the vessels holds, the elevators have in their tariff a line item for this operation, and will charge the vessel operators for this operation, which is not included in their “Flat Rate” fee, or the sales contract. It has been over a decade since we have seen this done, and on my most recent tour of one of the elevators, the elevator personnel did not know where this equipment was in which I showed it to him, as it was just off the dock, and he never knew what that piece of equipment was.

The elevator trimming charges are as follows:

UGC USD 3.30 per ST

EGT 5.50 per MT

Temco/KEX/CET advise charges are negotiable, which in my experience means they will charge what they want, which most likely will not be less than UGC elevator.

Also each elevator is different, in which the past one elevator only charged the fee for the “Trimmed Cargo” only, and another charged for the entire cargo loaded.

If we hear of any additional information, we will advise accordingly.

Best Regards,
Russ Lyzell
Vice President, Marketing


USTR Update - Suspension of Vessel Fees for One Year
  • by  Evan Jones
Good day all,

USTR has released the official notice on the suspension of section 301 fees for one calendar year effective today November 10, at 12:01 AM EST. Please see attached.

https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2025/november/ustr-suspension-action-section-301-investigation-chinas-targeting-maritime-logistics-and


USTR Update on Chinese Built/Owned/Operates Vessels - October 14, 2025 Commencement
  • by  Evan Jones

Full Detail PDF

Fm: General Steamship Corp - Mill Valley, CA

Good day all,

As the October 14, 2025 commencement date of the new USTR fees for Chinese built/owned/operated vessels approaches, we would like to provide you the latest summary of information as we understand it. There are still unfortunately many unanswered questions at this time, but below is our best summation of available information to date. Following is subject to change as new information is published by USTR/CBP, which we do expect to receive.

--------------------------

For most dry/liquid bulk and breakbulk carriers, there are two annexes in play with the new USTR regulations. Annex 1 and 2. Fee schedules for both are detailed below. We understand that if vessel qualifies for fees under annex 1, then it is exempt from fees under annex 2. If vessel does not qualify under annex 1, then it still may qualify under annex 2. Annex 1 takes priority. We will not have a situation where fees under both annexes apply, it will be one or the other or neither.

Annex I Fee on Chinese Vessel Owners / Operators

What it is: A fee on any vessel entering a U.S. port that is owned or operated by a Chinese entity (including mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau) as defined in Annex I. Taiwan is not included.

VESSEL OWNER WILL BE DETERMINED BY SHIP’S REGISTRY, AND VESSEL OPERATOR WILL BE DETERMINED BY U.S. COFR (CERTIFICATE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY) PER LATEST INFORMATION FROM CBP. IF EITHER OF THOSE ENTITIES ARE CHINESE COMPANIES, THEN THE FEES IN ANNEX 1 WILL APPLY.

Fee Schedule (net tonnage basis):

Effective Date / Fee per Net Ton (USD)
Until Oct 13, 2025 (180-day grace period) - $0
Oct 14, 2025 - $50
April 17, 2026 - $80
April 17, 2027 - $110
April 17, 2028 - $140

Caps/Limits:

  • -Max five fee assessments per vessel per year under Annex I.
  • -For vessels making multiple U.S. Port entries before heading to a foreign destination (i.e. multiple U.S port calls in one voyage or "rotation" or string), the fee is assessed one time per rotation


If vessel does not qualiy for fees under annex 1, then it still may qualify for fees under annex 2 as follows:

Annex II - Fee on Chinese-Built Vessels

This applies to Chinese-built vessels that are not already subject under Annex I. The fee is based on the higher of:

  • -A fee per net tonnage, or
  • -A fee per container discharged (for containerized cargo)


Fee Schedule:
Effective Date / Fee per Net Ton (USD)
Until Oct 13, 2025 - $0
Oct 14, 2025 - $18 / NT ; $120 / container discharged
April 17, 2026 / $23 / NT ; $153 / container
April 17, 2027 / $28 / NT ; $195 / container
April 17, 2028 / $33 / NT ; $250 / container

Caps/Limits:

  • -Also capped at five assessments per vessel per year.
  • -Assessed per rotation / string of U.S. port calls (same as Annex I) when vessel makes multiple U.S. port calls before heading abroad, only charged at first port.


Exemptions under Annex II

There are several classes of Chinese built vessels that are exempt from Annex II fees (i.e. they do not pay under Annex II even though they are Chinese built), provided none of the higher priority annexes apply. Key exemptions include:

  • 1. Vessels enrolled in key U.S. maritime security / sealift / cable programes, e.g.:
    • -Maritime Security Program (MSP)
    • -Tanker Security Program (TSP)
    • -Cable Security Program (CSP)
    • -The Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (VISA) or equivalents.
  • 2.Vessels arriving empty or in ballast(i.e. without cargo)
  • 3.Size / Capacity Thresholds: Chinese-built vessels under certain size (or cargo capacity) are exempt. Specifically:
    • -Container Ships 4,000 TEU (Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units) or less
    • -Breakbulk or general cargo vessels with deadweight tonnage ≤ 55,000 DWT
    • -Individual bulk capacity limit of 80,000 DWT or less for bulkers (ships carrying loose unpackaged goods like grain, coal, etc.)
  • 4.Vessels engaged in short-sea shipping:voyages under a certain distance from U.S. ports (less than 2,000 nautical miles for vessels entering the continental U.S.) are exempt.
  • 5.Certain U.S.-owned vessels or U.S-flagged vessels(or vessels owned by U.S. companies) even if built in China, when enrolled in those U.S. maritime programs.
  • 6.Specialized export vessels- certain kinds of specialized vessels (not defined in full detail in all summaries, but referenced) are exempt.
  • 7.U.S. government cargois not subject to these fees.


We have not been advised of any extension for the implementation of these fees beyond October 14. You should expect fees to begin on October 14. We are still awaiting highly anticipated FAQ document to be issued by USTR/CBP, and will pass to all parties upon receipt.

Our understanding at this time is that fee collection will go through the vessel agent when they enter the vessel with US Customs. Our presumption is that vessel will not be cleared with CBP/allowed to sail until these fees are paid in full. Per previous information from BIMCO, we understand that the time charterer/vessel operator will be the primary party responsible for paying these fees as a result of her employment in the U.S., and the head owners will for the most part be exempt. Although you should consult your own individual charter parties for confirmation on same.

We will be certain to provide any and all updates as available. Thank you.


California’s Emergency Ballast Water Management Rule in Effect
  • by  Evan Jones

Fm: General Steamship Corp - Stockton, CA

Good day all,

We would like to draw your attention to below emergency ruling that went into effect on June 18th for ballast discharges into California fresh water ports. In addition to normal ballast water treatment requirements, the state is now also mandating a ballast exchange IN ADDITION TO treatment, when the source of the ballast water is a location with salinity less than 18 parts per thousand.

We asked for an recevied clarification on several points:

This new requirement only applies to the few vessels where all three of these categories are true:

  • -Arriving in Stockton, Sacramento, or Carquinez (Port of Rodeo and eastward)
  • -Discharging ballast water at that arrival port
  • -Source water came from location with salinity less than 18 parts per thousand


The requirement is to exchange the ballast water at a distancemore than 50 nautical milesfrom land AND meet the discharge performance standards (treating with USCG approved BWTS). Also, the final discharged water must be at or above 30 parts per thousand salinity.

In short, if you are arriving from a fresh water port to a California fresh water port, ballast treatment AND mid ocean exchange is now required.

If ballast is sourced in Stockton, Sacramento, or Carquinez, and is not comingled with ballast from any other source, the state will allow you to discharge that same ballast in Stockton, Sacramento, or Carquinez, without exchange. However, the USCG does require treatment for ALL ballast exchanges under their federal regulations, thus if vessel’s treatment system is incapable of treating fresh water, vessel will be required to go a minimum 12nm offshore to do an open ocean exchange, before returning to port for deballasting operations.

We will be sure to guide master’s accordingly. Please let us know if you have questions. Thank you.

More information about the emergency rule is available at the California State Lands Commission: More details here



Thank you for reading the Gensteam Currents! Check back regularly for all the latest industry news and updates.
If you would like to register to receive industry updates in your inbox, please enter your email below.
If you would like to read our internal company newsletter, please click here.

Newsletter

Never miss a beat. Sign up to receive the latest industry news today!